Clarity is uneven
“Use AI responsibly” is a principle. It is not an answer to whether ChatGPT is allowed on tonight’s homework.
Georgia · Public data · Updated September 2026
AI Isn’t Waiting on Schools
See how other teachers, students, and parents are experiencing AI in Georgia schools — then take the pulse.
Scroll to see the policy landscape ↓
—district entities reviewed
—schools indexed
—formal policy or handbook rules
—with safety policy, guidance, or handbook rules
What the tool underneath looks like
Open a district. See Safety, Clarity, and how to act.
Homepage cards are teasers. The district page is the product: score breakdown, empty-state honesty, board contacts, and Deeper Evidence.
District page · scores
Fulton County Schools
Safety (~70%)
85
Strong · weighted heavier in Overall
Clarity (~30%)
88
Strong · classroom rules & guidance
Overall 86 · Strong — Safety ~70 + Clarity ~30
Live sample from the Fulton County Schools district page.
Act · Evidence
Board contacts & Evidence
- SuperintendentDr. Mike Looney
- Board chairKristin McCabe · Board President
- Tech leadDr. Joe Phillips · Chief Strategy & Technology
- SourceBoard Policy IFBI · CoC Rule 18k.III
Deeper Evidence — “Students are prohibited from creating, sharing, or distributing AI-generated, altered, or otherwise false images, videos, or digital content…” CoC Rule 18k.III
The policy explorer
Start with your district.
See what every Georgia district and private school publishes (or doesn’t) about AI for students and teachers. Search public, charter, and private-school entities — every result separates classroom clarity from AI safety protections.
What the map reveals
A policy can exist on paper and still leave a student guessing.
Safety is separate
We track deepfakes, impersonation, harassment links, and approved-tool rules independently from academic-integrity guidance.
Collecting Evidence
We’re still gathering graduation, attendance, and test-score gains tied to AI policy — work in progress, district by district. The free parent newsletter is how we ship those updates as they land.
Built for useful scrutiny
Public claims, translated into plain English.
Where we look
We look for public rules in board policies, student handbooks, codes of conduct, and guidance docs. If a deepfake or impersonation ban lives in the code of conduct, it counts the same as if it was in AI policy documentation. If we can’t find a public rule, that doesn’t mean the school is “safe,” and it doesn’t mean they never talked about it.
Published rules are not the same as day-to-day practice — the pulse is how we listen for what’s actually happening in classrooms.
Headline rank weights Safety ~70% and Clarity ~30%.